Nike WMNS Cortez Valentine’s Day DEABD1434

Reviewer juanita morris

Just a great walking shoe for this old man. Easy on and off, a cushioned sole, and plenty wide. As reviewers stated, they tend to pick up rocks off our driveway.

Reviewer trevstonlongworth

I normally only wear 574's from New Balance, but I purchased these because they share the same shoe last and they're similar. I can't say that I like them as well, but they're alright.

I believe the mid-soles are different, and while I think I like the 574 mid-sole better, the 565 doesn't seem bad. One thing I definitely don't like as well is the lack of mesh in the all-suede upper. They probably don't breath as well, but that's not a huge factor for me in a suede shoe. I just like the looks of the mesh/suede combo better then the all-suede shoe.

I saved my final criticism for last, because it applies to both the 565 and 574 models of "Lifestyle and Retro" shoes. These are the ones with model numbers that start with "ml". I don't like them because they appear to be the hipster version of New Balance shoes, with laces that usually match the suede. Like any good hipster shoe, they seem to be more narrow, which is antithetical to the very thing that made the 574, and probably 565, popular shoes in the first place (i.e. spacious.) Even though these are supposedly made on the same shoe last as other models in the line, they definitely don't have the advertised toe depth of the SL-2 shoe last. I've also noticed that many New Balance shoes made on the SL-2 last don't seem to be as wide as they used to be, so that issue probably isn't for the lifestyle and retro shoes alone.

Seems strange that New Balance would ruin a popular line of shoes by changing the very things that made them popular, but that's what they seem to be doing. For customers that want a more narrow 574, it seems like New Balance would just suggest the 363 or one of their models made on narrow shoe lasts. Regardless, I wish they'd leave the SL-2 shoes alone, so that customer who appreciate them can continue to do so. I've worn them for 20 years and the only thing that will stop that is if New Balance changes the shoes so much that they're not the same.

Reviewer Peter Schimpf

Lite weight, accurate size, not worn a lot yet though.

Reviewer Coguk

These are my favorite, wish they were still available.

Reviewer L Zelman

Happy with this shoe. I’d say that it fits close to the size vs being a little to large/small. Not for a wide foot though.

Reviewer Jack Prime

I bought these for my boyfriend on his birthday. He really likes Converse and thought it would be a good gift. He says that they fit fine and are comfortable to walk around in.

Reviewer M Fulks

These shoes were a great value for the price. They fit well at the correct size, very light and comfortable, and seem well made. I have had them for a month now and they have held up very well. However, there is a concern that I do not see others have mentioned. The soles are slippery on a smooth surface, they do not seem to grip like most sneakers, and this problem has persisted. Overall, this is not a big problem for me, but I can see this could be an issue for some and felt I needed to mention it.

Reviewer Sloopydrew

What can you say. They are chucks. Now arch support. You can get a good Dr Scholls for about $15.00 and then you're set. Easy to clean and comfortable.

Reviewer Justin E Sheriff

Lovely sneaker.
Sizing runs a little bit big.

Reviewer James E Bennett

Wanted the NB609 which of course has been discontinued. This shoe is it replacement. Not as happy with this shoe. Why do these retailers change something that works and replaces it with something of lesser quality or less comfort. I will never understand that. Keep a quality shoe and quit messing around. The reputation of the company is the one that suffers