Reviewer trevstonlongworth
I normally only wear 574's from New Balance, but I purchased these because they share the same shoe last and they're similar. I can't say that I like them as well, but they're alright.
I believe the mid-soles are different, and while I think I like the 574 mid-sole better, the 565 doesn't seem bad. One thing I definitely don't like as well is the lack of mesh in the all-suede upper. They probably don't breath as well, but that's not a huge factor for me in a suede shoe. I just like the looks of the mesh/suede combo better then the all-suede shoe.
I saved my final criticism for last, because it applies to both the 565 and 574 models of "Lifestyle and Retro" shoes. These are the ones with model numbers that start with "ml". I don't like them because they appear to be the hipster version of New Balance shoes, with laces that usually match the suede. Like any good hipster shoe, they seem to be more narrow, which is antithetical to the very thing that made the 574, and probably 565, popular shoes in the first place (i.e. spacious.) Even though these are supposedly made on the same shoe last as other models in the line, they definitely don't have the advertised toe depth of the SL-2 shoe last. I've also noticed that many New Balance shoes made on the SL-2 last don't seem to be as wide as they used to be, so that issue probably isn't for the lifestyle and retro shoes alone.
Seems strange that New Balance would ruin a popular line of shoes by changing the very things that made them popular, but that's what they seem to be doing. For customers that want a more narrow 574, it seems like New Balance would just suggest the 363 or one of their models made on narrow shoe lasts. Regardless, I wish they'd leave the SL-2 shoes alone, so that customer who appreciate them can continue to do so. I've worn them for 20 years and the only thing that will stop that is if New Balance changes the shoes so much that they're not the same.
Reviewer David Wickre
Never had vans before, thought I would give them a try. They are very well made and sturdy. The only reason I gave them 4 stars was the first day I wore them I got a blister on the back of my heel from them. Hopefully I can break them in with no more blisters! I really like the shoes so I hope they work out!
Reviewer Betty J Hanson
As of this review I don't know how much these shoes cost so I have to rate based on construction and comfort alone. I like to incorporate cost when I can but can't this time. These shoes are extremely light weight and seem to be very well constructed. I don't know how they will hold up when worn while running, but for basic comfort they feel good. They have a bit of a lower ridge in the inside where the toes go and I'm not sure if I like that yet or not. It does give my toes something to sort of grip. The laces allow me to tighten them up since I have a narrow foot. I like the colors and they have a nice, sleek look about them. They don't feel good when worn without socks because of some scratchiness so if you like go sockless you might not like these shoes. But when worn with socks they are very comfortable. I received a size 9 for review and they seem true to size. These seem to be true to size.
Reviewer SSchabo
So comfortable, The slip right on your feet and are super comfortable even for wide feet they feel like socks with a cushy bottom. These have a pulltab on the heel to make them easy to get on and they do have laces to tighten if you so desire but I don’t need to tighten them because they stay on just fine. The insole is a super soft memory foam and the cushion feel lasts throughout my 2 mile walk- it does not just crush down and stay.
Reviewer xterra06
My husband wears these. Sometimes his feet swell around the ankle area, the strap adjusts to this well. Nicely padded throughout, good arch support,nicely made. This is his second pair, they wear very well. ... and no break in time. Worth every penny. He usually wears 10 1/2 wide and the 10.5 3E is perfect for him. They shipped quickly too.
Reviewer Trinity Palms
fit perfectly in my dad’s usual size. went on easy, look great! good support!
Reviewer Heather Erwin
I put fits as expected because the other options didnt make sense to the problem. They have nice arch support but are too tight around the center of the foot. The toes and heal is a bit loose however. Not worth the price. I bought a 50$ pair of sketchers that were much better than these. Not satisfied.
Reviewer Barbara Topper
Very attractive casual shoe. They are comfortable and look great with jeans and a T-shirt. Cannot comment on their longevity, but I didn’t pay much for them so I don’t expect them to last for years or anything.
Reviewer Mrs Murty
I really like these shoes. I generally like low-top, minimal sneakers without super-thick soles. I have a martial arts background; so although there's a trade off with the lack of cushioning, I prefer the greater sense of stability and groundedness that comes with being better able to feel the ground through your shoes.
These, are perfect for me. I typically wear a US 9.5 to US 10; and got a pair of these in size 43; which totally fit my feet like a second skin. I also added rubber shoelaces to make them slip-ons; and now, it's really a challenge not to just wear these, *all the time.* They are perfect for casual/street-wear, and also for impromptu action.
Reviewer tmotors
Christmas gift for my niece, she loves them. White are her favorite
Show40-
400(Results:
2921)
English
