Reviewer Bob Jaggie
Purchased for a recent trip, husband loves them.
Reviewer Paul A Houle
Son loved them. They were what he was looking for but he certainly did not expect it!!
Reviewer Genaro J Cid
Ordered some Skechers golf shoes. They were incredible. So I ordered these and holy cow. These are just as comfy as the golf shoes.
Reviewer Ariadne H
My son loves them, easy on, easy off, no ties!
Reviewer trevstonlongworth
I normally only wear 574's from New Balance, but I purchased these because they share the same shoe last and they're similar. I can't say that I like them as well, but they're alright.
I believe the mid-soles are different, and while I think I like the 574 mid-sole better, the 565 doesn't seem bad. One thing I definitely don't like as well is the lack of mesh in the all-suede upper. They probably don't breath as well, but that's not a huge factor for me in a suede shoe. I just like the looks of the mesh/suede combo better then the all-suede shoe.
I saved my final criticism for last, because it applies to both the 565 and 574 models of "Lifestyle and Retro" shoes. These are the ones with model numbers that start with "ml". I don't like them because they appear to be the hipster version of New Balance shoes, with laces that usually match the suede. Like any good hipster shoe, they seem to be more narrow, which is antithetical to the very thing that made the 574, and probably 565, popular shoes in the first place (i.e. spacious.) Even though these are supposedly made on the same shoe last as other models in the line, they definitely don't have the advertised toe depth of the SL-2 shoe last. I've also noticed that many New Balance shoes made on the SL-2 last don't seem to be as wide as they used to be, so that issue probably isn't for the lifestyle and retro shoes alone.
Seems strange that New Balance would ruin a popular line of shoes by changing the very things that made them popular, but that's what they seem to be doing. For customers that want a more narrow 574, it seems like New Balance would just suggest the 363 or one of their models made on narrow shoe lasts. Regardless, I wish they'd leave the SL-2 shoes alone, so that customer who appreciate them can continue to do so. I've worn them for 20 years and the only thing that will stop that is if New Balance changes the shoes so much that they're not the same.
Reviewer Lori Kaczmarek
They're so comfortable, I'm on my feet 12 hrs 6 days a week
Reviewer G Sydnor
Shoes look and feel great. I'm very happy with them, though I've already scuffed them up a bit from overuse - that should tell you how often I've been using them! I really enjoy these and I'm glad I got them for the summer. Looking forward to getting them clean and bright for much more use. Thank you very much!
Reviewer R M GONZALEZ
Great arch support and keen fashion appeal. Very comfortable.
Reviewer TBC Titan
I've had back problems for years, and now am in the middle of two hip replacements. Meaning tying shoes is not an option. Of all the slip ons I have, I love these the most. 2 pair at 40 bucks a pair??? I love them beyond words. Super light. Not for cold weather, mind you, and slippery on icy stuff, for for spring summer and fall they are the bomb.
Reviewer Brett Rolfe
Excellent product por su comodidad, buena inversión.
Show44-
440(Results:
961)