Reviewer trevstonlongworth
I normally only wear 574's from New Balance, but I purchased these because they share the same shoe last and they're similar. I can't say that I like them as well, but they're alright.
I believe the mid-soles are different, and while I think I like the 574 mid-sole better, the 565 doesn't seem bad. One thing I definitely don't like as well is the lack of mesh in the all-suede upper. They probably don't breath as well, but that's not a huge factor for me in a suede shoe. I just like the looks of the mesh/suede combo better then the all-suede shoe.
I saved my final criticism for last, because it applies to both the 565 and 574 models of "Lifestyle and Retro" shoes. These are the ones with model numbers that start with "ml". I don't like them because they appear to be the hipster version of New Balance shoes, with laces that usually match the suede. Like any good hipster shoe, they seem to be more narrow, which is antithetical to the very thing that made the 574, and probably 565, popular shoes in the first place (i.e. spacious.) Even though these are supposedly made on the same shoe last as other models in the line, they definitely don't have the advertised toe depth of the SL-2 shoe last. I've also noticed that many New Balance shoes made on the SL-2 last don't seem to be as wide as they used to be, so that issue probably isn't for the lifestyle and retro shoes alone.
Seems strange that New Balance would ruin a popular line of shoes by changing the very things that made them popular, but that's what they seem to be doing. For customers that want a more narrow 574, it seems like New Balance would just suggest the 363 or one of their models made on narrow shoe lasts. Regardless, I wish they'd leave the SL-2 shoes alone, so that customer who appreciate them can continue to do so. I've worn them for 20 years and the only thing that will stop that is if New Balance changes the shoes so much that they're not the same.
Reviewer David Wickre
Never had vans before, thought I would give them a try. They are very well made and sturdy. The only reason I gave them 4 stars was the first day I wore them I got a blister on the back of my heel from them. Hopefully I can break them in with no more blisters! I really like the shoes so I hope they work out!
Reviewer Janet Blok
These are some really nice leather shoes for men. The leather and soles are both very good quality. These are nicely shaped and the finish is just beautiful. My husband really likes these shoes a lot and they look so good on his feet. He wears a size 8 and these shoes fit well (size 8). As of this review I don't know how much they cost but they are some fine looking dress shoes.
Reviewer PHILLY BOXBOY
very comfortable I love it ..I have it in blue and gray
Reviewer luvinGmom
They fit well and are comfortable. He uses them around the house instead of slippers. He has good support shoes for walking.
Reviewer BRIAN MACMASTER
If you are looking for that OLD school So Cal Vato Loco look. Then you have arrived!
They are thin top material. Flat sole (inside) borderline cheesy, but I love them! Little step on heel has a little cush. So flimsy, can slip them on while they are tied. Convenient, with that classic look. No running Holmes.
Reviewer Kenny Boy
Son muy cómodas y el color es bello es lo que yo esperaba
Reviewer Helene B
no arch support and thin insole. Looks like you could replace the insole if needed but they don't look tall enough to accommodate arch supports or orthotics. Not important to my teenager but felt it worth mentioning for adults.
Reviewer Marni Opatowsky
I’ve only worn these a few times so I cannot comment on how long they will last, but they are perfect for slipping on to run around and do errands. Haven’t worn them for very long periods, but they are comfortable. They suit the purpose I purchased them for.
Reviewer Lee Ann S
I love these shoes, my only complaint is that they seem to wear out faster than I'd expect. I've happily bought three pairs so far.
Show76-
760(Results:
2630)